This chart provides a good breakdown of five different tiers of the animal-protection movement. Find the one that’s right for you and then let the Humane Party know by submitting the volunteer application.
The Humane Party symbol and original logo (the “classic” logo)
In 2009, the Humane Party selected the bovine as the party’s primary symbol because bovines are currently subject to some of the most extreme forms of human brutality. Bovines have also been so thoroughly propertized that one commonly used plural word for bovine cows and bulls is “cattle”—a word derived from the Anglo-French catel, meaning “property”.
The colors and stars used in the original, “classic” logo were intended to evoke those of the American flag.
The negative spaces between the legs of the bovine depict the silhouettes of three other animals. These additional animals were included to indicate three levels of U.S. government—federal, state, and local—and thereby show that the scope and aim of the Humane Party is fully commensurate with that of other political parties.
The “Violence Is Not Entertainment” (VINE) Act is a proposed update of U.S. intellectual property law. Under the VINE Act, animal abusers can no longer establish, maintain, or enforce intellectual property (“IP”) rights in material that includes abuse of a live animal.
The VINE Act directly impacts two bodies of IP law at the federal level—copyright and trademark—and serves as a model for analogous legislation at the state level. Drafting of a separate act abolishing patent eligibility for animal-abuse methods and devices is also underway.
Materials described in 17 U.S.C. 102—such as still photographs, video recordings, or audio recordings—will be excluded from copyright eligibility if those materials record acts of animal abuse. For example, property rights under U.S. law no longer attach to materials recording bullfights, dogfights, cockfights, horse races, dog races, animal sacrifices, vivisection, bestiality, or rodeo events, regardless of where those materials are recorded.
This portion of the VINE Act depropertizes only those materials that visibly or audibly record abuse of an actual, living animal. For example, illustrations, animations, and computer-generated simulations of animal abuse are unaffected by the VINE Act.
TRADEMARK / SERVICE MARK
Marks for goods and services that necessarily require death or mutilation will no longer be registrable with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”), and such marks that have already been registered will no longer be recognized as property under U.S. law. For example, the USPTO no longer grants, renews, or otherwise recognizes registration of marks wherein the identified goods include dead body parts, such as fur, skin, bone, ivory, or muscle tissue.
The VINE Act does not restrict, encumber, or otherwise affect the creation, financing, production, possession, reproduction, distribution, transmission, hosting, storing, advertising, marketing, publication, sale, rental, loan, display, viewing, or consumption of animal-abuse materials. Rather, the VINE Act merely withdraws Congress-created intellectual property status from such materials. Therefore, free speech rights under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution are unaffected by the VINE Act.
An initial draft of the VINE Act will be published for public comments and editorial suggestions later in 2016. Suggestions received from the public during the public-comment period will be reviewed, and the text of the VINE Act will be revised to incorporate such suggestions as appropriate.
Yes. The Humane Party platform calls for abolishing the property status of all animals throughout the United States of America. The HP developed the Abolition Amendment, a proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution, for this very reason and created Aboliton Day (December 6) to promote abolition.
Here is the relevant excerpt from the Humane Party platform (2014 edition):
RESOLVED that appropriate legislation be enacted and appropriate governmental action taken so as to:
end inhumane, scientifically indefensible, and economically unsound exploitation of other species by humans, such legislation and action including but not limited to:
- elimination of both domestic and foreign trade in sentient beings, regardless of species;
- elimination of torture, mutilation, and slaughter of such beings;
- elimination of both domestic and foreign trade in products resulting from or obtained by way of such exploitation, such products including dead body parts of animals and live animal secretions; and
- elimination of services that include or are provided by way of such exploitation, such services including experiments performed on live animals and entertainment events that include live animals.
abolish the property status of (“emancipate”) other animals by either:
- explicitly recognizing all other animals as fully protected individuals under the 13th Amendment prohibition of slavery; or
- ratifying a new Constitutional amendment emancipating all other animals.